Parker v. Brown
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 341 (1943)
In an effort to prevent agricultural waste, the California Agricultural Prorate Act (CAPA) established programs intended to restrict competition among farmers and stabilize prices. In particular, CAPA established a system to classify raisins and distribute each grade of raisin in a manner deemed necessary for market stabilization. The system included participation by local farmers in the form of public hearings and voting. However, final authority for administration of the program lay with a state commission created by CAPA. Brown (plaintiff), a raisin farmer, sued to enjoin state officials (defendants) from enforcing CAPA, arguing that CAPA violated the Sherman Act.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.