Parker v. Crete Carrier Corp.

839 F.3d 717 (2016)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Parker v. Crete Carrier Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
839 F.3d 717 (2016)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Obstructive sleep apnea was a condition that caused individuals to intermittently stop breathing during sleep. Untreated, obstructed sleep apnea caused daytime sleepiness, leading to impaired driving skills and increasing the risk of motor-vehicle accidents. A sleep study was the only way to determine whether a person suffered from obstructive sleep apnea, and an in-lab study was the most reliable method of analysis. Individuals with a high body mass index (BMI) were the most likely to have the condition. The Department of Transportation (department) required commercial-vehicle drivers to get medical examinations to determine whether they were physically qualified to drive. The department recommended that drivers with high BMIs undergo an additional sleep study to determine whether they suffered from obstructive sleep apnea. Crete Carrier Corporation (Crete) (defendant) began requiring its drivers with high BMIs to undergo in-lab sleep studies. Robert Parker (plaintiff) was a commercial driver for Crete with an excellent driving record and no history of sleep issues. However, Parker registered a high BMI during his physical examination, and Crete’s policy required Parker to participate in an in-lab sleep study. Parker went to his primary physician and received a note saying that a sleep study was not necessary, but Crete refused to exempt Parker from the study requirement. Parker refused to undergo the sleep study, and Crete stopped giving Parker work. Parker filed suit in federal district court, alleging that Crete’s sleep-study requirement violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The district court granted summary judgment to Crete, and Parker appealed to the Eighth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Benton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership