Parker v. Illinois Masonic Warren Barr Pavilion

299 III. App. 3d 495, 701 N.E.2d 190 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Parker v. Illinois Masonic Warren Barr Pavilion

Illinois Appellate Court
299 III. App. 3d 495, 701 N.E.2d 190 (1998)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Meta Krueger (plaintiff), an elderly woman, was admitted to the Illinois Masonic Warren Barr Pavilion (Warren Barr) (defendant) for short-term rehabilitative care following a spinal fracture. Krueger’s admissions evaluation indicated she needed mobility assistance. Krueger’s rehabilitation goal was to become independently ambulatory. Approximately one month after Krueger’s admission, she fell in the bathroom. Krueger had not called for assistance getting to the bathroom and had not put on her anti-slip slippers. After the fall, Krueger’s doctor told nursing staff that Krueger needed supervision and assistance when walking or transferring herself in and out of bed. Despite the doctor’s orders, Krueger’s nurse still only assisted Krueger when called. Shortly after, Krueger’s nurse informed Krueger that she was being moved to a different room. Because no one came to help Krueger move, Krueger packed her belongings herself and moved them into the hallway. Krueger did not call for assistance. In the process of moving her belongings, Krueger fell and broke her hip. On the day of Krueger’s second fall, staff notes indicated that Krueger could not independently ambulate. Krueger needed surgery and extensive physical therapy for her broken hip. Krueger brought a negligence action against Warren Barr under Illinois’s Nursing Home Care Act. After a jury trial, the jury awarded damages to Krueger but reduced the amount based on Krueger’s comparative fault. Warren Barr appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cousins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership