From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Parks v. City of Warner Robbins
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
43 F.3d 609 (1995)
In 1985, the City of Warner Robbins (city) (defendant) enacted an antinepotism policy to decrease conflicts of interest, favoritism, family conflicts, and sexual harassment. The policy prohibited relatives from serving in supervisory positions within the same department. In 1989, Brenda Parks (plaintiff) and A. J. Mathern became engaged. Parks and Mathern were both in supervisory positions within the city’s police department. Parks and Mathern were informed that, because of the policy, Parks, who had less seniority, would be terminated following their marriage. Parks filed a lawsuit against the city, the mayor, and the city council (defendants). Parks argued that the policy was violative of (1) the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it denied her the fundamental right to marry, (2) the right of intimate association rooted in the First Amendment because her employment was contingent on her decision not to marry, and (3) the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment because the policy had a disparate impact on women due to the fact that more men held supervisory positions. The district court granted summary judgment for the city. Parks appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Birch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 608,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 608,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.