Parks v. FIA Card Services, N.A. (In re Marshall)

550 F.3d 1251 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Parks v. FIA Card Services, N.A. (In re Marshall)

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
550 F.3d 1251 (2008)

Facts

Bryan and Julie Marshall (debtors) had two credit card accounts with MBNA Corporation, successor in interest to FIA Card Services, N.A. (MBNA), and two credit card accounts with Capital One. In 2005, the Marshalls filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. During the 90 days before their bankruptcy filing, the Marshalls directed Capital One to transfer their Capital One account balances totaling $38,000 to their MBNA accounts. After the bankruptcy filing, bankruptcy trustee Linda Parks sought to recover the $38,000 as preferential transfers. The bankruptcy court concluded that the payments to MBNA were not preferential transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) because they were not transfers “of an interest of the debtor in property.” The bankruptcy court found instead that the Marshalls had merely substituted one creditor for another. The district court affirmed after analyzing the case under the earmarking doctrine, which provides that in some circumstances, a debtor’s use of borrowed funds for the purpose of paying a specific debt is exempt from the bankruptcy trustee’s power to avoid transfers. The court found that (1) the Marshalls lacked sufficient control over the payments to MBNA for the payments to constitute property interests of the Marshalls, and (2) the bankruptcy estate had not been diminished by the payments to MBNA. Parks appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership