Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Parsons v. Jefferson-Pilot Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
426 S.E.2d 685 (1993)


Facts

Louise Price Parsons (plaintiff) was a shareholder in Jefferson-Pilot Corporation (Jefferson) (defendant). Parsons sent a letter to Jefferson requesting any records of any actions taken by directors, minutes of any shareholder meetings, and records of actions taken by the shareholders, in order to determine any possible mismanagement. Jefferson refused to provide Parsons with a list of the names of non-objecting beneficial owners (the NOBO list), or to allow Parsons to inspect Jefferson’s accounting records, stating that it did not maintain a list of beneficial owners, and that the accounting records were not within the scope of North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) § 55-16-02(b). Parsons brought suit to compel Jefferson to permit inspection of the records. The trial court denied Jefferson’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Jefferson was required to permit Parsons to inspect its accounting records and records of shareholder and director actions, but was not required to provide Parsons with the NOBO list, because Jefferson did not have the names of those owners. The court of appeals agreed that Jefferson was not required to provide the NOBO list, and that Parsons’ written demand to inspect described her purpose, and the records she sought to inspect, with reasonable particularity. The court of appeals reversed the finding that Parsons had a right to inspect Jefferson’s accounting records. Both parties petitioned this court for review of the court of appeals’ decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Mitchell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.