Parvi v. City of Kingston
New York Court of Appeals
41 N.Y.2d 553, 362 N.E.2d 960, 394 N.Y.S.2d 161 (1977)
- Written by Michael Beverly, JD
Facts
Parvi (plaintiff) was trying to break up a fight between two brothers behind a commercial building. The police responded to a complaint and found all three showing the effects of alcohol. Parvi told the police that he had nowhere to go, so instead of arresting Parvi, the police took him to an abandoned golf course outside the city limits to let him sober up. Approximately one hour after Parvi was dropped off by the police, Parvi wandered nearly 350 feet onto the highway and was hit by a car and injured. Parvi sued the City of Kingston (defendant) for false imprisonment. At trial, Parvi admitted he had no recollection of what happened the night of the incident. The police described Parvi as responsive to their commands to get in the car and testified that he requested to be let off elsewhere. The trial court dismissed the case, and the Appellate Division affirmed. Parvi appealed to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fuchsberg, J.)
Dissent (Breitel, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.