Pascu v. State

577 P.2d 1064 (1978)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pascu v. State

Alaska Supreme Court
577 P.2d 1064 (1978)

KL

Facts

James Blair was a police agent and long-time friend of Gordon Pascu (defendant). One day, while working at the police’s direction, Blair called Pascu and asked to buy some heroin. Pascu declined and said he was trying to stop using heroin. Blair claimed he was very sick due to withdrawal and continued to try to persuade Pascu, reminding him they had been friends for a long time and that Pascu owed him several favors. Pascu again refused, stating that he was trying to stay away from heroin. Blair insisted, arguing that Pascu would feel better if he took a little heroin to get over his own withdrawal sickness, offered to give Pascu some heroin, and promised to pay him enough money to allow Pascu to buy enough heroin to last for a few days. Eventually, Pascu agreed to sell Blair heroin. Pascu was arrested and indicted for the sale of a controlled substance. Pascu sought a pre-trial hearing on the defense of entrapment. The court held that the evidence was not sufficient to establish the defense. Pascu was convicted and appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burke, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership