Pat H. Roundtree et al. v. John Hutchinson

107 P. 345 (1910)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pat H. Roundtree et al. v. John Hutchinson

Washington Supreme Court
107 P. 345 (1910)

KL

Facts

Beginning in 1855, a group of neighbors used a plot of land owned by one neighbor as a cemetery. By the time the landowner sold the land in 1884, 40 people had been buried there. That buyer sold the land to John Hutchinson (defendant) in 1887. Hutchinson and the prior owner were aware that the land was used as a burial ground. Hutchinson forbade the burying of additional remains after taking over ownership of the land but did not object to the fact that the land was used as a cemetery. Hutchinson’s stance changed in 1908, when he removed the tombstones and plowed and seeded the ground. Pat H. Roundtree and other family members of those buried there (Roundtree) (plaintiffs) sued to restrain Hutchinson from desecrating the burial ground and to establish a right to enter and exit the land by the family members of the deceased. The lower courts ruled for Roundtree, finding that the prior landowners’ usage of the land created an implied dedication of the burial ground to public use. Hutchinson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gose, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership