Patricide Case
Japan Supreme Court
Hanrei Jiho (No. 697) 3 (1973)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
After World War II, the National Diet of Japan—Japan’s legislature—amended the Criminal Code of Japan to conform with the newly enacted Constitution of Japan. However, the Diet did not amend Article 200 of the Criminal Code, which imposed harsher penalties for homicide involving linear ascendants than for any other homicide. Around 1973, a man perpetrated incestuous abuse upon his daughter over the course of 10 years. Eventually, the woman killed her father due to the abuse. The Japanese government charged and convicted her with homicide under Article 200 of the Criminal Code. The case came before the Japan Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Concurrence (Tanaka, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

