Patterson v. Paul
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
863 N.E.2d 527 (2007)
In 1986, a large tract of land was divided into three smaller lots. Each lot had a view of Little Pleasant Bay. Each of the three deeds included a view easement over the other lots. Each view easement prohibited the construction of any building that would block the view of another lot. Further, each easement permitted the easement holder, upon notice, to enter onto the other lots to trim the tops of trees should they begin to block a lot’s view. The view easements were not limited in duration. David Patterson and Deborah Allen (plaintiffs) owned the middle subdivided lot. Gertrude Paul (defendant) and Katherine and Rives McGinley (defendants), respectively, owned the other lots. The plaintiffs planted trees and other vegetation along each property line. In 2003, Paul gave notice to the plaintiffs that she would be trimming some of this planted vegetation in accordance with her view easement. The plaintiffs brought suit, seeking a declaratory judgment that the easements were limited to 30 years in duration pursuant to a state statute that limited by default the duration of land restrictions that did not themselves expressly contain a duration. The land court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the easements were affirmative easements and thus not restrictions on land use and not subject to the 30-year statutory limitation. The plaintiffs appealed, arguing that the view easements were negative easements and thus restrictions on land use.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Spina, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.