Patterson v. Sacramento City Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 337 (2007)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
James Patterson (plaintiff) participated in a truck-driver training course conducted by the Sacramento City Unified School District (defendant). As part of the course, the participants did community service that simultaneously gave them experience loading and unloading flatbed trucks. For one of his community-service projects, Patterson and the other students were told to load wooden bleachers onto a flatbed trailer and move them to another location. The students were not supervised during this activity, and were not instructed regarding how to load the trailer. Patterson climbed onto the trailer and, with another student, helped pull the bleachers onto the trailer while other students pushed from below. When the students on the ground gave a last push to heft the bleachers onto the trailer, Patterson fell backward off it. Patterson sued the school district for negligence, alleging that it had a duty to supervise the community-service activity. The school district moved for summary judgment, arguing that by participating in the course, Patterson assumed the risk of the course’s activities. The trial court granted the motion, holding that assumption of risk barred Patterson’s negligence claim. Patterson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cantil-Sakauye, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.