Pavlides v. Galveston Yacht Basin
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
727 F.2d 330 (1984)
- Written by Ross Sewell, JD
Facts
Sam Pavlides and four friends were fishing in Pavlides’s Robalo 236 (R-236) motorboat when the bilge drain plug slipped out, causing the boat to take on water and quickly capsize. Pavlides and three of his friends were killed in the boating accident. AMF Slickcraft Boat Division, Inc. (AMF Slickcraft) (defendant) marketed the R-236 to the general public, and the owner’s manual and sales pamphlet did not mention the boat had a void bilge and bilge drain, or the hazards of bilge flooding. In addition, the R-236 did not have a flood-warning device or an automatic bilge pump, and it was not self-bailing like other Robalos. Pavlides’s estate (plaintiff) sued AMF Slickcraft, alleging it was strictly liable for defects in design, manufacture, or marketing. The trial court held that AMF Slickcraft was not strictly liable because AMF Slickcraft could assume that Pavlides knew how to operate his R-236 and that AMF Slickcraft only had a duty to warn experts. Pavlides’s estate appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.