Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Pavlik v. Consolidation Coal Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
456 F.2d 378 (1972)


Facts

Pavlik (plaintiff) granted Consolidation Coal Co. (defendant) an easement “for the purposes and with the rights of constructing, maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, replacing and removing one pipe line for the transportation of coal slurry.” The easement, which cost $995, would terminate if the pipeline ceased to be used “for the purpose set forth herein” for a period of one year. Consolidation supplied coal to the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) using the pipeline from 1957 to 1963. In 1963, Consolidation and CEI executed a supplemental agreement by which they put the pipeline into an inactive state, although Consolidation was obligated to maintain the pipeline in standby, ready to resume operations upon notice. Meanwhile, Consolidation and Pavlik agreed by a series of supplemental agreements to extend the one-year defeasance timeframe. They stipulated that they had negotiated to remove the defeasance clause and to allow the transmission of products other than coal slurry, and that the purpose of the extension was to “preserve the status quo” during negotiations. Negotiations failed and there were no more extensions after May 1967. Pavlik then sought a declaration of rights under the contract. The district judge held that the inactivity of the pipeline did not terminate the easement because it was kept ready to transport coal slurry. Pavlik appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Edwards, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (McCree, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.