Appellate Court of Connecticut
911 A.2d 747 (2006)
On February 7, 2003, the plaintiff met the defendant’s employee, Michal Robson, to look at cars for purchase. The plaintiff identified himself as Paul Payne. In actuality, Payne is the plaintiff’s cousin. The plaintiff had stolen Payne’s identifying documents and $3,000 in cash. The plaintiff agreed to purchase a car and provided Payne’s driver’s license for the paperwork. Robson noticed the discrepancy between the plaintiff’s appearance and the photo on the driver’s license, but continued with the sale and received $1,300 from the plaintiff as a down payment. After the plaintiff left, Robson located Payne’s phone number and called him regarding the sale. Payne explained to Robson that the plaintiff had stolen his identity and requested that Robson call the police. The police instructed Robson to arrange for the plaintiff to pick up the car, at which time the police arrested the plaintiff. The plaintiff was convicted for identity theft, forgery, and criminal attempt to commit larceny. The plaintiff subsequently brought suit against the defendant seeking $1,300 in compensatory damages and $9 million in punitive damages. The trial court ruled that the plaintiff had no possessory interest in the stolen money and therefore lacked standing to bring the suit. Accordingly, the trial court dismissed the case. The plaintiff filed a motion to open the judgment. The court denied the motion and the plaintiff appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gruendel, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.