Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Payton v. Weaver

182 Cal. Rptr. 225 (1982)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 31,100+ case briefs...

Payton v. Weaver

California Court of Appeal

182 Cal. Rptr. 225 (1982)

Facts

Brenda Payton (plaintiff) had chronic, end-stage renal disease, meaning that her kidneys no longer worked. Payton needed to have a medical treatment called dialysis to stay alive and began receiving this treatment from Dr. John Weaver (defendant) at Biomedical Application of Oakland, Inc. (BAO) (defendant). Payton was an admitted drug addict with alcohol, weight, emotional, and financial problems. For years, Payton did not follow Weaver’s medical instructions, showed up to appointments late, and was very disruptive (e.g., she was loud, used obscenities, pulled out her needle, and showed her genitals). Weaver sent Payton several notices terminating their treatment relationship. Payton applied to Alta Bates (defendant) and Herrick Hospitals (Herrick) (defendant) for dialysis care, but they rejected her. Weaver continued to provide dialysis to Payton on an emergency basis because she did not have other care. Payton sued Weaver to compel care, and they entered into a stipulated order agreeing that Payton would behave and Weaver would provide care. Payton did not follow any of the agreed-upon conditions. Weaver contacted Payton’s attorney to end Payton’s care again and to help arrange alternate care. Payton sued Weaver, BAO, Alta Bates, and Herrick. The trial court found that none of the providers had any continuing legal duty to care for Payton. Payton appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grodin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 557,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 557,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 31,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 557,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 31,100 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership