Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,400+ case briefs...

PDQ Lube Center, Inc. v. Huber

Utah Court of Appeals
949 P.2d 792 (1997)


On September 17, 1993, PDQ Lube Center Services, Inc. (PDQ) (plaintiff) offered to purchase real property from R. Lowell Huber (defendant) for $125,000.00. On September 22, 1993, Huber accepted PDQ’s offer. The contract required PDQ to apply for a loan within seven days. It further required PDQ and the property to qualify for the loan within 60 days of acceptance. The property would be deemed qualified if it was appraised at no less than the value of the purchase price. The closing date was set for December 15, 1993. The parties later added an addendum to the contract to address possible contamination of the property due to the prior operation of a gas station on the premises. Huber agreed to obtain an environmental clearance and to remove underground tanks from the property upon PDQ’s payment of a $4,000.00 cleanup deposit. The contract included an integration clause and a provision stating that time was of the essence. PDQ timely sought financing pursuant to the contract. Huber received the $4,000.00 deposit from PDQ but did not remove the tanks after learning that the previous owners would not assist in removing the tanks. PDQ ultimately did not obtain a loan or appraisal, and the transaction did not close. PDQ brought suit against Huber for breach of contract. The trial court found that Huber failed to act in good faith by failing to remove the tanks. It also found that its conduct prevented PDQ from formally applying for a loan and obtaining an appraisal, due to the fact that applying for a loan and conducting an appraisal before the tanks were removed would have been futile. The trial court therefore granted PDQ specific performance, requiring Huber to obtain an environmental clearance and to convey the property to PDQ if PDQ tendered the purchase price within 84 days after the environmental clearance was obtained. Huber appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 373,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,400 briefs, keyed to 223 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial