Pecan Shoppe of Springfield, Missouri, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co.

573 S.W.2d 431 (1978)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pecan Shoppe of Springfield, Missouri, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals
573 S.W.2d 431 (1978)

Facts

Transportation company Tri-State Motor Transit Company (Tri-State) (defendant) was certified by the federal Interstate Commerce Commission to transport dangerous commodities. Half of Tri-State’s business consisted of hauling explosives and other dangerous materials. In September 1970, union-represented employees of Tri-State went on strike. After the strike began, people began committing acts of violence against Tri-State, including shooting weapons and throwing rocks at Tri-State vehicles. On September 30, a nonstriking Tri-State employee was driving a Tri-State truck carrying a load of dynamite on a Missouri highway when one of the striking employees shot a rifle at the truck. The shot caused the dynamite to explode, killing the driver and destroying the truck. The explosion also heavily damaged nearby land on which Pecan Shoppe of Springfield, Missouri, Inc. (Pecan Shoppe) (plaintiff) operated a gas station and restaurant. Pecan Shoppe sued Tri-State in Missouri state court to recover for the damaged property. At trial, Pecan Shoppe sought a directed verdict on the issue of liability, asserting that Tri-State was strictly liable for the explosion and resulting damages. The trial court refused to direct a verdict, and the jury ultimately returned a verdict in Tri-State’s favor. Pecan Shoppe appealed. On appeal, Tri-State argued that the trial court had not erred in refusing to grant the directed verdict because strict liability was inapplicable to a common carrier’s transportation of explosives and because the explosion had been caused by the striking employee’s criminal conduct (i.e., shooting the rifle).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flanigan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership