Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Pederson v. McGuire

South Dakota Supreme Court
333 N.W.2d 823 (1983)


In 1946, the City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, granted the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company (the railroad) an irrevocable easement for a right-of-way contiguous to a commercial property called Cargill Tract #1. The only way to access Cargill Tract #1 was to cross over the railroad’s easement. The railroad stopped using its easement adjacent to Cargill Tract #1 in 1975. In 1978, the Pedersons (plaintiffs) bought Cargill Tract #1. At the time of their purchase, the Pedersons received a license from the railroad to install a road crossing the railroad’s easement. In 1981, Sioux Sound Co. (Sioux Sound) executed a contract to purchase Cargill Tract #1 from the Pedersons for $135,000. The agreement provided for payment of $1,000 upon signing, $29,000 upon closing, $42,000 as a first mortgage, and $63,000 as a second mortgage. No time was specified for when Sioux Sound would obtain the mortgages. The Pedersons were required to furnish title insurance showing good and merchantable title on closing, as well as a warranty deed upon full payment of the $135,000. The contract additionally stated that time was of the essence to the contract. Sioux Sound’s president, Robert McGuire (defendant) visited Cargill Tract #1 several times and noted the railroad track near the property. Sioux Sound’s attorney discovered the railroad’s easement and license relevant to Cargill Tract #1 and cancelled the purchase agreement. Over the next few months, the Pedersons amended the license it had received from the railroad, but Sioux Sound was not satisfied and still would not perform on the purchase agreement. The Pedersons sued for specific performance. The trial court granted specific performance but required the Pedersons, at their own expense, to terminate the Railroad’s interest in the easement. The Pedersons did so. Sioux Sound appealed, arguing that it was able to rescind the contract because of the contract’s statement that time was of the essence. Because the title to Cargill Tract #1 was encumbered by an easement and license that took several months to clear, Sioux Sound argued that the time-is-of-the-essence clause was violated.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Henderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 499,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 499,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial