Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Pekelnaya v. Allyn

802 N.Y.S.2d 669 (2005)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Pekelnaya v. Allyn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

802 N.Y.S.2d 669 (2005)

Facts

Aba and Michael Taratuta (plaintiffs) were walking on the sidewalk when they were injured by a fence that fell from the roof of the Park 106 Condominium (condominium). The condominium’s board of managers had taken out a $2 million insurance policy for the condominium. However, the damages resulting from the Taratutas’ injuries exceeded $2 million. As a result, the Taratutas brought suit against the owners of the individual units in the condominium (unit owners) (defendants) to cover the difference. The Taratutas claimed the unit owners qualified as “owners” under New York’s Multi Dwelling Act which imposed tort liability on building owners. New York’s Condominium Act was silent as to liability with respect to a common element of a condominium. The New York Supreme Court denied the unit owners’ motions to dismiss. The unit owners appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tom, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership