Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Pellar v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
25 T.C. 299 (1955)


Facts

Mr. and Mrs. Pellar (plaintiffs) contracted for the construction of a new house for $40,000. During construction, they added upgrades, which increased their cost to about $55,000 but also increased the house’s value to about $70,000. The contractor spent considerably more than $70,000 to complete construction, because in addition to the cost of the upgrades, the contractor incurred significant rework and additional labor costs. The contractor was willing to absorb the loss, because he had extensive existing business ties and hoped for future business ties to Mrs. Pellar’s father, and wished to retain the father’s good will. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) issued a deficiency notice against the Pellars for failing to report, as income, the difference between their purchase price and the cost of construction. The Pellars petitioned for a redetermination. As a preliminary matter, the tax court considered whether the deficiency, if any, was only the $15,000 difference between what the Pellars had paid and what the house was worth, rather than what the contractor spent on the construction.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.