Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Lululemon Athletica Canada, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2022 WL 4585812 (2022)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Peloton Interactive, Inc. (plaintiff) was a leading interactive fitness platform. In 2016, Peloton entered into a cobranding agreement with Lululemon Athletica Canada, Inc. (defendant), an activewear company. Under the agreement, Peloton sold Lululemon apparel cobranded with Peloton’s name. In 2021, Peloton ended the relationship and launched its own apparel brand. On November 11, 2021, Lululemon sent Peloton a cease-and-desist letter alleging that several Peloton apparel items infringed Lululemon’s patents and trade dress. The letter demanded that Peloton stop the alleged infringement and respond by November 19, 2021, or face legal action in federal court for patent and trade-dress infringement as well as trade-secret misappropriation. Peloton requested, and Lululemon granted, an extension of the response deadline to November 24. However, rather than responding to Lululemon’s letter, Peloton filed this declaratory-judgment action on November 24, 2021, seeking a declaration that it had not infringed Lululemon’s patents or trade dress, that the patents were invalid and unenforceable, and that Lululemon had no protectable trade-dress rights in the disputed designs. Five days later, on November 29, Lululemon filed a complaint for patent and trade-dress infringement in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the present action, Lululemon moved to dismiss, arguing that Peloton’s suit was an improper anticipatory declaratory-judgment action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

