Pena Real Estate Investments, LLC v. One Hardt, LLC
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
2023 WL 3997038 (2023)

- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
Bernardo Pena was the manager of Pena Real Estate Investments, LLC (Pena Real Estate) (plaintiff). Maria Kunhardt was the manager of One Hardt, LLC (defendant). Kunhardt was listed in state corporate filings as the designated person for executing contracts related to real estate properties for One Hardt. Drimel Reyes, Kunhardt’s son, was also a member of One Hardt. Pena and Reyes entered negotiations for Pena Real Estate to purchase several properties from One Hardt. During these negotiations, Kunhardt allegedly waited outside in the car, aware of the negotiations. Pena and Reyes eventually executed an agreement for the properties. Reyes allegedly did so with Kunhardt’s knowledge and authority. As part of the agreement, Pena Real Estate deposited $5,000 of earnest money to One Hardt. Before the closing date, One Hardt sold the properties to another buyer. Pena Real Estate sued One Hardt for breach of contract, among other things. One Hardt moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. One Hardt argued that Reyes lacked any authority to enter the agreement and bind One Hardt (i.e., that Reyes did not have authority from Kunhardt to enter the contract on behalf of One Hardt). According to One Hardt, the contract was therefore unenforceable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Talwani, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.