Penland v. Harris

520 S.E.2d 105 (1999)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Penland v. Harris

North Carolina Court of Appeals
520 S.E.2d 105 (1999)

Facts

After Angela Harris (defendant) gave birth to her daughter, she and her daughter lived with her mother, Brenda Penland (plaintiff), and the mother’s husband, David Penland (plaintiff), while Angela earned a nursing degree. During that time, the Penlands claimed they assumed parental roles, providing the child with food, private schooling, and healthcare, and ensuring a stable environment. When the child was almost six, Angela married Andrew Harris and took the child with her to live with her at Andrew’s apartment. The Penlands had little contact with Angela. Unhappy with the new arrangement, the Penlands filed an action seeking joint custody of the child, claiming that they should have custody and control at least 50 percent of the time. They argued such a custody award was in the child’s best interests. As support, they expressed their disapproval of Andrew, Andrew’s residence, and the Harrises’ babysitters, and expressed concern that Angela might not permit the child to attend the private school or church she had previously attended. Angela moved to dismiss the petition, arguing that because she was the child’s biological parent and was fit to care for the child, the Penlands did not have a viable claim for joint custody. The trial court agreed and dismissed the Penlands’ petition. The Penlands appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership