Pennsylvania v. Mimms
United States Supreme Court
434 U.S. 106 (1977)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Philadelphia police officers stopped a car driven by Harry Mimms (defendant) because the car had an expired license plate. Although this was a routine traffic stop and the officers had no reason to suspect criminal activity, they ordered Mimms to exit the vehicle. After Mimms exited the car, the police noticed a bulge in Mimms's jacket. The police frisked Mimms and found a revolver under his jacket. The State of Pennsylvania (plaintiff) prosecuted Mimms for carrying a concealed gun without a permit. The trial judge denied Mimms's motion to exclude the gun from evidence. The gun was introduced into evidence, and Mimms was convicted. Mimms appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The state high court reversed the conviction on the grounds that, because the police ordered Mimms to exit the car without any reason to suspect his involvement in criminal activity, the seizure of Mimms's gun was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.