Pennsylvania v. West Virginia

262 U.S. 553 (1923)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pennsylvania v. West Virginia

United States Supreme Court
262 U.S. 553 (1923)

Facts

For many years, the natural-gas production in West Virginia (defendant) exceeded the in-state demand. Consequently, West Virginia encouraged corporations to develop pipelines transporting natural gas to neighboring states, such as Pennsylvania and Ohio (plaintiffs), thus increasing the market area. In all three states, the pipelines were operated as public utilities, and the natural gas supplied was used by both public institutions and private residents. Over time, West Virginia’s demand for natural gas increased. At the same time, its supply was decreasing because of the ongoing extractions. To ensure adequate in-state supply, the West Virginia legislature enacted a statute that required pipeline companies to satisfy all in-state needs before exporting gas to other states, essentially mandating a preference for in-state consumers. Giving preference to in-state needs would necessarily deplete the supply available to Pennsylvania and Ohio, both of which relied on gas from West Virginia to meet fuel and lighting needs. Pennsylvania and Ohio sued West Virginia, seeking to enjoin enforcement of the West Virginia act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Van Devanter, J.)

Dissent (Brandeis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership