Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Penobscot Area Housing Development Corp. v. City of Brewer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
434 A.2d 14 (Me. 1981)


Facts

The Penobscot Area Housing Development Corporation (the Corporation) (plaintiff) was an organization that provided housing for mentally disabled individuals. The Corporation purchased a house in the City of Brewer (the city) (defendant), Maine, in which the Corporation planned to house six mentally disabled individuals and two Corporation staffers. The on-site staffers would live in the house on a rotational basis. The house was located in an area zoned for single-family, residential use. The Corporation applied to the city for an occupancy permit. A code enforcement officer for the city denied the application, finding that the Corporation’s planned use for the house did not meet the city’s definition of a family and thus could not be permitted in the residential zoning district. The city’s zoning regulations included in the definition of a family a collective body of persons living together in a domestic relationship based on a domestic bond. The regulation explicitly distinguished groups living in boarding houses, fraternity houses, or other similar homes from this type of domestic bond. The city’s Board of Appeals (the Board) and the superior court affirmed the code enforcement officer’s decision. The Board also found that the average stay of a mentally disabled individual in the house was approximately one to one and a half years. The Corporation appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Nichols, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.