Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

People ex rel. Dickinson v. Van De Carr

87 A.D. 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903), 87 App.Div. 386, 84 N.Y.S. 461 (1903)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

People ex rel. Dickinson v. Van De Carr

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division

87 A.D. 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903), 87 App.Div. 386, 84 N.Y.S. 461 (1903)

Facts

Van de Carr (defendant) was an alderman of New York City. Antonio Covino was terminated from New York City’s Department of Street Cleaning. John Woodbury, the commissioner of street cleaning for New York City, wrote a letter to Van de Carr, stating that Covino’s termination case would be reconsidered if the board of aldermen approved additional funds for the street-cleaning department. Van de Carr responded, stating that he would vote to help Woodbury obtain the additional funds if Covino was reinstated. When these letters were written, the board of aldermen had a pending bill that would authorize the issuance of corporate stock to provide additional funds for the street-cleaning department. Van de Carr was charged with violating § 72 of the New York State Penal Code (Penal Code) by accepting a bribe. Van de Carr admitted that the two letters were sent and received but claimed that those letters did not violate the Penal Code. The court of special sessions held Van de Carr on bail and ordered Van de Carr to appear on the charge in the court of general sessions. Van de Carr appealed the order, challenging whether the charges were properly brought against him.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Laughlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership