People v. Anderson

51 Cal.4th 989, 252 P.3d 968 (2011)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Anderson

California Supreme Court
51 Cal.4th 989, 252 P.3d 968 (2011)

Facts

Paul Anderson (defendant) was a methamphetamine addict who entered an apartment carport with the intent of stealing a car. Anderson successfully entered Pamela Thompson’s car, started it, and attempted to drive out of the carport, but because the carport’s gate did not open automatically, Anderson backed into a spot to wait for an entering car to trigger the gate to open. Thompson returned to the carport, discovered her car had been stolen, and walked around attempting to find it. After an entering car came through the gate into the carport, Anderson accelerated toward the gate in an attempt to get through the gate before it closed again. Thompson was walking in front of the gate as Anderson drove through it, and he struck and killed her. Anderson claimed that hitting her was an accident and that he had not intended to hit, injure, or frighten her. Anderson was charged and convicted of first-degree felony murder based on robbery, robbery, and receipt of stolen property. Anderson appealed, alleging that the trial court had erred by failing to issue a sua sponte instruction to the jury on a theory of accident as a defense to robbery. The court of appeal sustained Anderson’s assertion, and the prosecution appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)

Concurrence (Kennard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership