Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

People v. Ashley

267 P.2d 271 (1954)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

People v. Ashley

California Supreme Court

267 P.2d 271 (1954)

Play video

Facts

Ashley (defendant), the business manager of a corporation, obtained a loan from 70-year-old Mrs. Russ by promising that the loan would be secured by a first mortgage on certain improved property owned by the corporation and used to build a theater on other, separate property owned by the corporation. However, the corporation did not own the improved property and no theater was ever built. Ashley used the money to pay some of the corporation’s operating expenses. After Ashley received the money from Mrs. Russ, she frequently argued with him over his failure to deliver the promised first mortgage. Russ finally received a note of the corporation secured by a second deed of trust on some of its unimproved property. Russ later testified that she accepted the security because Ashley had told her to “take that or nothing.” Additionally, Ashley obtained $13,590 from a Mrs. Neal, stating that the corporation intended to use the money to purchase a theater. Neal was told that the loan would be secured by a deed of trust on the theater building and that she would have good security for her loan because the corporation was worth a large sum of money when in fact it was financially struggling. After receiving the money from Neal, Ashley issued her a note of the corporation for $13,500. Thereafter, Neal loaned the corporation an additional $4,470, receiving a note for $17,500 in exchange for the previous note. Neal later testified that when she hesitated in making the additional loan, Ashley placed a gun on his desk and verbally threatened her. The corporation never bought the theater and Neal never received a deed of trust. The money was deposited into the corporation’s account. Ashley was convicted of grand theft under § 404 of California’s Penal Code. At trial, evidence showed that Ashley drew no salary from the corporation but drove an expensive car purchased by the corporation and drew numerous checks for the payment of expenses. The trial court denied Ashley’s motion for a new trial, and Ashley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)

Concurrence (Schauer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership