People v. Ashley

42 Cal. 2d 246, 267 P.2d 271 (1954)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Ashley

California Supreme Court
42 Cal. 2d 246, 267 P.2d 271 (1954)

Play video

Facts

George Ashley (defendant) managed a corporation. Ashley asked Mattie Russ and Maude Neal to loan the corporation money for building a movie theater. Ashley promised Russ that her loan would be secured by a specific piece of property that he claimed the corporation already owned. Ashley promised Neal that (1) her loan would be secured by the theater building that would be purchased with her money and (2) the corporation had sufficient assets to pay back the loan. Based on Ashley’s promises, the two women lent their money to Ashley. However, the corporation did not own the property that Ashley had promised as security for Russ’s loan. Further, the corporation never bought the building that Ashley had promised as security for Neal’s loan, and the corporation was struggling financially. Ashley never provided the promised security interests to either woman, nor did he use the money as promised. Instead, the money from both loans went into the corporation’s operating accounts. Ashley used these operating accounts to buy a nice car for his own use and to pay expenses for his own activities. Ashley was charged in state court with grand theft for stealing Russ’s and Neal’s money, which included the crime of theft by false pretenses. A jury convicted Ashley, and the state appellate court affirmed the convictions. Ashley appealed to the California Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Schauer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership