People v. Baskerville
New York Court of Appeals
457 N.E.2d 752 (1983)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Someone robbed the Plattsburgh air-force base exchange. The robber wore a hooded sweatshirt with the lower half of his face covered and a towel wrapped around his arm. One witness said she saw something black inside the towel, which she thought was a gun. Another witness said the robber raised his towel-wrapped arm, pointed it at someone, and threatened to kill her. The robber took $30,000 from the cashier’s safe and stuffed it into a plastic trash bag. Within a half hour, airman Kaydon Baskerville (defendant) told an acquaintance someone had robbed the exchange. Less than three hours later, Baskerville put down $6,000 on a new car—in cash still bundled in wrappers dated, initialed, and stamped with the base exchange’s official seal. A search of Baskerville’s room turned up $1,000, a bag matching the trash bag, clothing matching witness descriptions, and a sneaker matching a footprint by the exchange. The trial judge instructed the jury to convict for first-degree robbery only if Baskerville displayed something that appeared to be a weapon. The judge explained that making someone believe something was a weapon, or holding or wrapping something to create that impression, sufficed. The jury convicted. Baskerville appealed on multiple grounds, including that the evidence did not show the robber displayed a weapon.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Meyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.