People v. Beggs

178 Cal. 79, 172 P. 152 (1918)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Beggs

California Supreme Court
178 Cal. 79, 172 P. 152 (1918)

Facts

Joseph Da Rosa was arrested for stealing items from his employer, Joseph Steining. Da Rosa was booked at the police station for petit larceny but had not yet been formally charged. Da Rosa admitted that he had stolen the items, which were valued at less than $50, and offered to repay the value of the items. Steining had hired an attorney, Beggs (defendant), to represent him in the matter. In the course of interviewing Da Rosa, Beggs discovered that Da Rosa had approximately $2500 deposited in two banks. Beggs told Da Rosa that his crime and situation were very serious and that he would be sent to prison for seven to ten years if he did not immediately give Beggs $2000, which Beggs stated he would use to settle the claims with Steining. Based on his fear of these threats, Da Rosa went with Beggs to his banks. He withdrew and gave $2000 to Beggs, who later gave $900 of the money to Steining. Beggs was charged and convicted of extortion. Beggs appealed, alleging that threatening to prosecute a debtor for a crime from which the debt allegedly arose is not extortion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shaw, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership