People v. Berge

620 P.2d 23 (1980)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Berge

Colorado Supreme Court
620 P.2d 23 (1980)

Facts

Attorney William Berge (defendant) represented Allen Stephenson in various matters for nearly 20 years until Stephenson’s death. Ten years before Stephenson’s death, Berge prepared a will leaving two-thirds of the residue to the Denver Dumb Friends League (DFL) and one-third to Angel Memorial Animal Hospital (the animal hospital). A year after executing the first will, Stephenson asked Berge to prepare a new will leaving part of the residue to Berge. Berge declined to draft the will and recommended two attorneys. Stephenson rejected them, requesting someone in Berge’s firm. Berge recommended Smith, an independent practitioner who rented space in Berge’s law office and regularly interacted with Berge. Stephenson agreed. Immediately after, Stephenson met with Smith, and Smith drafted a new will. The meeting lasted 15 minutes. Smith offered no substantive advice to Stephenson. Under the new will, Stephenson reduced the gift to the DFL to $25,000, canceled the gift to the animal hospital, and left 53% of the residue to Leon DuCharme and 47% to Berge. A few days later, Berge acted as a witness to the will’s execution. Smith prepared the will as a favor to Berge and did not charge Stephenson. Ten years later, Stephenson died. The probate court designated DuCharme special administrator, and DuCharme named Berge as his attorney. DuCharme and Berge inventoried Stephenson’s estate, which totaled nearly $600,000. Berge informed the DFL that it would receive $25,000 rather than two-thirds of the estate and misrepresented the estate’s total value as $250,000. The DFL retained an attorney to investigate. The residuary beneficiaries under the first and second wills reached a settlement in which the DFL and the animal hospital divided one-third of the residue and DuCharme and Berge divided the remaining two-thirds. After taxes and expenses, Berge received more than $113,000. A grievance was filed, and the grievance committee (plaintiff) initiated disciplinary proceedings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lohr, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership