People v. Bland

28 Cal. 4th 313, 48 P.3d 1107 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Bland

California Supreme Court
28 Cal. 4th 313, 48 P.3d 1107 (2002)

SC
Play video

Facts

Kenneth Wilson, Skylar Morgan, and Leon Simon were in a car. Jomo Bland (defendant), shot at the car after identifying Wilson. Wilson died, and Morgan and Simon were injured. Bland was charged with Wilson’s murder and the attempted murder of Morgan and Simon. At trial, the court instructed the jury on transferred intent as applied to the murder of Wilson. The instructions did not discuss transferred intent as applied to attempted murder. The court further instructed the jury that a determination of premeditation of Wilson’s murder does not carry over to premeditation for the attempted murder charges. In other words, the court instructed the jury that they had to determine the intent separately for each count of murder and attempted murder. Bland was convicted of the murder of Wilson and the premeditated attempted murders of Morgan and Simon. The appellate court reversed the attempted-murder convictions, finding that the trial court’s jury instructions were erroneous. The Supreme Court of California granted the Attorney General’s petition for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership