People v. Breton
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
237 Ill. App. 3d 355, 603 N.E.2d 1290 (1992)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Keith Breton (defendant) was on trial for sale of cocaine. The man to whom Breton sold the drugs, Gary Wehrmeister, agreed to testify against Breton at trial. Days later, a fellow inmate of Breton told authorities that Breton was seeking out a hit man to kill Wehrmeister to prevent Wehrmeister from testifying. The state’s attorney’s office then implemented an undercover operation whereby Breton’s fellow inmate provided Breton with the contact information of hit men who were actually undercover agents. Over the course of the next two weeks, Breton contacted the agent posing as a hit man and discussed his desire to have Wehrmeister killed. During the conversations, Breton provided information about Wehrmeister’s location and habits and gave detailed instructions on how the agent could collect the cash payment for the job. The State of Illinois (plaintiff) subsequently charged Breton with solicitation of murder for hire under § 8-1.2(a), which provided that a person was guilty of solicitation of murder for hire when, intending that the crime of murder be committed, he procured another to commit the offense by way of any agreement, command, or request for anything of value. A jury convicted Breton, and he appealed, contending that, because the undercover agent did not actually “agree” to the solicitation, a bilateral agreement, as required by the statute, never existed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Unverzagt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.