People v. Brown

117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 738 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Brown

California Superior Court, Appellate Division
117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 738 (2001)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

The state (plaintiff) charged James Brown (defendant) with the misdemeanor offenses of making a criminal threat and vandalism in connection with an incident that occurred on June 15, 1999, between James and his wife, Monique Brown. Evidence at trial showed that James was a former famous football player who kept a loaded gun by his bed. On June 15, officers responded to a 911 call from Monique, reporting domestic violence. Outside the home, Monique was very upset but rational and coherent; she relayed to officers that she and James had gotten into a fight about James’s suspected infidelity, he had threatened to kill her, and he had used a shovel to hit her car that was parked in the garage. Inside the home, officers arrested James and observed the shovel and vandalized car in the garage with dents and broken windows. At the police station, Monique cooperatively told officers about prior incidents of domestic violence. The jury heard Monique’s 911 call and saw video footage of the incident scene. On the stand, Monique minimized the events of June 15, claimed that she had instigated or provoked James, denied that he had threatened to kill her, disclaimed any prior incidents of domestic violence, and testified that she had “dared” James to break the car, effectively giving him permission to do it. According to Monique, the car was titled in her name but actually owned by James’s corporation. The jury acquitted James of the criminal-threat offense but convicted him of vandalism. At sentencing, the trial court indicated that it would impose a 12-month domestic-violence counseling program as a mandatory term of probation, discussing how James’s conduct was tremendously violent and done with the intent to impact Monique. On hearing this, James rejected probation. The court then imposed the maximum jail sentence of six months, considering the nature of the offense, James’s attitude, and his character traits. James appealed, challenging the probation term and sentence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lee, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership