People v. Burkett

220 Cal. App. 4th 572, 163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 259 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Burkett

California Court of Appeal
220 Cal. App. 4th 572, 163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 259 (2013)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

On May 2, 2011, Penny Lynn Burkett (defendant) and Nicholas Cummings kicked down a door to a house and removed copper pipes and other scrap metal and fixtures from it, causing over $400 of damage. Mersa Noor owned the house, but he rented it out to tenants until April 30, 2011, at the latest. The last tenant had not yet returned the keys to Noor, but the house was entirely empty of the tenant’s property. Noor intended to move into the house because his own home went into foreclosure, but the government (plaintiff) presented no evidence that Noor had moved in yet when the burglary occurred. Although Noor may have slept at the house with just a blanket a few nights after the burglary, Noor did not move in until May 8 or 9. A jury convicted Burkett of first-degree burglary. Burkett appealed, conceding that she committed burglary but that she was guilty only of second-degree burglary because the prosecution failed to prove that the house was inhabited.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Raye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership