People v. Cage
Michigan Supreme Court
410 Mich. 401 (1981)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Cage (defendant) went to a car dealer and told the salesman that he intended to buy the car if he liked it after a test drive and having it checked out by a mechanic. Cage did not actually intend to buy the car. Instead, Cage intended to take the car for his own use. The State of Michigan (plaintiff) charged Cage with theft by false pretenses. Cage initially pleaded guilty and then appealed, challenging the factual basis for the plea. The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed, and Cage petitioned the Michigan Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.