Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

People v. Cleaves

California Court of Appeal
229 Cal. App. 3d 367 (1991)


Facts

John Cleaves (defendant) was present at the death of Mr. Eaton. Cleaves and Eaton had engaged in a one-night sexual encounter, after which Eaton said that he had AIDS and wished to commit suicide before reaching the late stages of the disease. Cleaves, who had previously witnessed the impact of AIDS on his friends, agreed to help Eaton commit suicide by strangulation. Eaton tied a sash around his neck and had Cleaves attach the sash to Eaton’s hands and feet such that Eaton could strangle himself by straightening his body while lying facedown on the bed. Cleaves, without using pressure on Eaton, placed his hands on Eaton’s back to prevent Eaton from falling off the bed. After the sash slipped from Eaton’s neck, Cleaves reattached the sash. Cleaves admitted that, after the reattachment, he exerted additional pressure and also lay on Eaton to keep Eaton steady. According to Cleaves, he did not otherwise participate in the physical strangulation, which occurred as a result of Eaton straightening his body. After Eaton’s death, Cleaves left Eaton’s home with some of Eaton’s personal property and withdrew cash from Eaton’s bank account, per an agreement between Cleaves and Eaton before the suicide. Cleaves was convicted of second-degree murder under California Penal Code section 187 after the trial court denied Cleaves’s request for a jury instruction on the lesser offense of aiding and abetting a suicide under California Penal Code section 401. Cleaves appealed his conviction on the ground that the trial court erred in denying his request for the additional jury instruction.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Work, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.