Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

People v. Crane

Illinois Supreme Court
585 N.E.2d 99 (1991)


Facts

David Crane (defendant) was arrested on traffic violations in New Mexico, but because there was a notice of his probation violation and an outstanding warrant for him in relation to the murder of Robert Gahan in Illinois, he was arrested and held there. Thereafter, Illinois detectives Roger Costello and Larry Schultz interviewed Crane in New Mexico about his relationship to Gahan. Crane told the detectives that he had been hitchhiking and that Gahan gave him a ride. While driving, Crane said Gahan asked him if he wanted to smoke some marijuana. Crane said he did. Crane directed Gahan to a secluded area where they parked, got out, and began smoking the marijuana. Thereafter, Gahan began to choke Crane. Crane reacted by repeatedly striking Gahan with numchucks until he fell to the ground. Thinking Gahan was dead Crane took the car to a friend’s house and told him what had happened. Crane’s friend told him to destroy the evidence. Crane returned to where Gahan was, poured gasoline over him, and lit him on fire. Crane later learned that Gahan may not have been dead at the time of the burning. Crane was charged with two counts of murder. Both counts alleged that Crane beat and burned Gahan, thereby causing his death. Count I charged that Crane acted “with intent to kill or do great bodily harm.” Count II charged that Crane acted “knowing such acts created a strong probability of death or great bodily harm.” At trial, Crane requested that the jury be instructed on self defense as well his primary theory of defense, mistake of fact. The trial court instructed the jury on self defense but refused to give the requested mistake of fact instruction. Crane was convicted and he appealed. The appellate court reversed the conviction and the Illinois Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Heiple, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.