People v. Crews
Illinois Supreme Court
122 Ill. 2d 266, 119 Ill. Dec. 308, 522 N.E.2d 1167 (1988)
- Written by Nicole Gray , JD
Facts
William Crews (defendant) was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of one Illinois state prison correctional officer and to 30 years in prison for the attempted murder of another. The conviction followed Crews’s attack on the officers while serving a 20 to 60-year prison term at one of the state’s correctional facilities for an earlier murder conviction. Crews initially pleaded not guilty to charges stemming from the officer attacks but eventually changed his plea to guilty but mentally ill (GBMI). Illinois law allowed offenders who were not insane but who had substantial disorders of thought, mood, or behavior that impacted their judgment when they committed their crimes to receive treatment along with their punishments. An Illinois-county trial judge accepted Crews’s GBMI plea and ordered a statutorily required psychological evaluation of Crews. After Crews’s evaluation and based on several psychological reports, one indicating an opinion that Crews was feigning mental illness, the trial judge sentenced Crews to death for the murder conviction. The sentence was based on the judge’s finding that Crews’s significant history of violent criminal conduct, including over 70 incidents beyond the attack on the two officers that resulted in discipline while Crews was incarcerated, supported the belief that Crews was not acting under the influence of an extreme mental or emotional disturbance sufficient to preclude the imposition of the death penalty. Crews sought review of his death sentence by the state’s highest court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)
Dissent (Simon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.