People v. Davis

912 N.E.2d 1044 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Davis

New York Court of Appeals
912 N.E.2d 1044 (2009)

Facts

Wayne Davis (defendant) was charged with violating a New York City Parks and Recreation Department rule that prohibited being in city parks after posted closing times. Violations were a class B misdemeanor. New York’s Criminal Procedure Law § 350.20 allowed class B misdemeanors to be tried and decided by judicial hearing officers (JHOs) instead of criminal-court judges if the parties agreed. Before trial, Davis signed a form consenting to adjudication by a JHO. Based on an officer’s testimony attesting to Davis’s presence in a city park after closing, the JHO convicted Davis. The appellate term affirmed. Davis appealed to the New York Court of Appeals, arguing that allowing JHOs to decide class B misdemeanors violated the New York Constitution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ciparick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership