People v. Dupree
Michigan Supreme Court
56 N.W. 1046 (1893)
Mr. Dupree (defendant) rigged the window of a shoe shop to prevent the window’s bolt from locking into its slot. He did this so that the window would look closed, but could be opened from the outside. A few days after rigging the window, Dupree used it to gain access to the shoe shop. Upon gaining entry, Dupree stole three pairs of shoes. He was convicted of burglary. Dupree appealed, arguing that he could not have committed a burglary because the window was partially raised when he rigged it days before the theft occurred.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Grant, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.