People v. Eyen
Illinois Court of Appeals
683 N.E.2d 193, 291 Ill.App.3d 38 (1997)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The State of Illinois (plaintiff) prosecuted John Eyen (defendant) for driving under the influence of alcohol. The trial evidence established that police officers observed a badly damaged car with its front driver-side door open. Eyen was pushing against the door and moving the car along a public street. Eyen was clearly inebriated. The officers started the car's engine, and determined that the car could only be pushed with the ignition key inserted and the transmission in neutral gear. Eyen admitted shutting the engine off and removing the key from the ignition switch. The officers arrested and searched Eyen, and found the key in Eyen's pocket. Eyen said someone else had been driving the car, and denied having driven the car while inebriated. The trial court convicted Eyen, he appealed to the Illinois Court of Appeals. Eyen did not contest the trial court's finding that he was inebriated, but contended that the evidence was insufficient to show he was operating the car at the time of his arrest.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.