People v. Flores
New York Supreme Court
476 N.Y.S.2d 478 (1984)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Flores (defendant) and his accomplice committed a robbery and fled in a van. Two police officers, Officer Pagano and Sergeant Halbekath, saw the van and began pursuing the robbers in a high-speed chase in their police car. Witnesses traveling in the same direction saw portions of the chase, but the van and the police car sped around a curve and out of the witnesses’ sight. When the witnesses continued around the curve, they saw that an accident had occurred between the police car and a truck that had been illegally abandoned on the side of the highway. There was no evidence of any physical interaction between the van and the police car immediately prior to the accident. Officer Pagano was killed, and Sergeant Halbekath was seriously injured in the accident. Flores was charged with second-degree murder based upon the state’s robbery felony-murder statute, among numerous other charges. The prosecution asserted that the felony-murder charge was warranted because the police officers were killed while pursuing Flores after he committed a robbery. At trial, Flores moved for a dismissal of the case for lack of legally sufficient evidence proving that he caused the accident.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McMahon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.