Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

People v. Freeman

California Court of Appeal
97 Cal. Rptr. 717 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)


Facts

Norman Freeman (defendant) was charged with first-degree robbery. Lee Foster was the gunman during the robbery. Fred Knipp interviewed Anna Duckworth, the mother of Foster’s girlfriend, about the morning of the robbery. According to Knipp, Duckworth told him that she had been at her daughter’s house on the morning in question. Duckworth also told Knipp that Foster had been at the house as well and that Freeman had come to the house to pick up Foster. At trial, the prosecution called Duckworth as a witness. Duckworth denied telling Knipp that Foster had been at the house and that Foster had left the house with Freeman. Duckworth was excused with the consent of both parties and left the courtroom. The prosecution then called Knipp as a witness. Knipp testified, over Freeman’s objection, that Duckworth had told him that Foster had been at the house and that Foster had left with Freeman. Duckworth’s and Knipp’s testimonies at trial were identical to their testimonies during the prosecution’s offer of proof. Freeman was convicted. Freeman appealed, arguing that the admission of Knipp’s testimony was an abuse of discretion.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Friedman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.