Illinois Appellate Court, First District
510 N.E.2d 963 (1987)
Stanley Gentry (defendant) lived with his girlfriend, Ruby Hill. On December 13, 1983, Gentry and Hill had an argument, during which Gentry spilled gasoline on Hill. She later went into the kitchen and was near the stove when the gasoline ignited. Gentry was able to put the fire out, but Hill sustained serious burns. Gentry was tried for attempted murder. The trial court instructed the jury on the definition of attempt murder, as well as the four different mental states that were sufficient to prove murder. Gentry appealed, arguing that the court’s instruction as to the four different mental states allowed the jury to convict him for attempt murder without showing that he had the specific intent to kill.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Linn, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.