People v. Howk

365 P.2d 426 (1961)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Howk

California Supreme Court
365 P.2d 426 (1961)

SH

Facts

On July 13, 1960, Abdullah killed Sonja and attempted to commit suicide. In the days leading up to the murder, Abdullah, knowing Horowitz (defendant) possessed some guns, told Horowitz that he wanted to kill Sonja and needed a gun. Horowitz furnished a gun, but Abdullah returned it almost immediately, stating he did not possess the guts to use it. Thereafter, Abdullah threatened to kill Sonja in front of other witnesses and also stated that he knew Horowitz possessed guns. One of these witnesses expressed his concern for Abdullah’s mental condition and warned Horowitz against giving Abdullah a gun. On July 13, Abdullah learned Horowitz had been dispossessed of his apartment and invited Horowitz to bring his things, including his guns, to his apartment. Abdullah again asked Horowitz for a gun, this time to protect himself. Horowitz sold and furnished a loaded gun to Abdullah. On the night of the murder, Horowitz voluntarily reported to campus police and made numerous statements. Horowitz told the police that the gun used in the murder was his and that he and other witnesses heard Abdullah threaten to kill Sonja. Horowitz admitted that a couple of days before the murder he had furnished Abdullah with a gun but that Abdullah returned the gun, stating he did not possess the courage to use it. Horowitz admitted to furnishing Abdullah with a gun upon his second request, believing, based on that prior exchange, that Abdullah would not use it. Horowitz was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and Horowitz appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Peters, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership