Supreme Court of California
872 P.2d 1183 (1994)
On June 15, 1990, Hector Guillermo Iniguez (defendant) woke the victim by walking naked into the room where she was sleeping, pulling down her pants, and fondling her buttocks. Iniguez then had nonconsensual intercourse with the victim. The victim did not resist or attempt to escape Iniguez’s unwanted sexual contact. The victim testified that she did not attempt to resist or attempt to escape because she was paralyzed with fear. Iniguez was convicted of rape. The court of appeals reversed, reduced Iniquez’s conviction to sexual battery, and remanded for resentencing. In reaching this decision, the appellate court concluded that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that Iniguez used force or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury to have sex with the victim. The prosecution petitioned for review of the appellate court’s decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Arabian, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.