Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

People v. Jeffers

California Court of Appeal, Fifth District
49 Cal.Rptr.2d 86 (1996)


Facts

Bronico D. Jeffers (defendant), a convicted felon, entered a gun shop and asked to speak with an employee, Richard Maness. Charles Bodoh, the shop’s owner, informed Jeffers that Maness was busy and offered to help Jeffers. Jeffers handed Bodoh a wrapped box and told him that he was making a delivery for a friend. Bodoh unwrapped the box as Jeffers began to leave the shop. Bodoh stopped Jeffers and informed him that the box contained a .380 caliber handgun and that he would need Jeffers’ name, address, and telephone number in order to enter the gun into the shop’s logbook. After Jeffers provided the information he left the shop. Shortly thereafter, it was learned that the gun’s serial numbers had been filed off which was reported by Bodoh to the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF). A detective with the sheriff’s department, Richard Beaudreaux, subsequently confiscated the handgun and contacted Jeffers. Jeffers told Beaudreaux that he had taken the gun to the shop for a friend, Richard Kent Johnson. However, Jeffers could not tell Beaudreaux how to locate Johnson and the detective was unable to locate Johnson after a brief search. Jeffers was indicted for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of California’s Penal Code § 12021. At trial, Jeffers argued that he had no knowledge of what was inside the box when he delivered it to the gun shop. Jeffers also requested that the court instruct the jury that § 12021 is not violated automatically when an ex-felon comes into possession of a firearm, without knowledge that he has a firearm, but later learns of the firearm. The court refused to give the instruction and Jeffers was convicted. He appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.